Kinder Morgan: Democracy and rule of law at work

By Yves Faguy April 17, 201817 April 2018

Kinder Morgan: Democracy and rule of law at work

Part of the plan to get the back on track the promise from the Trudeau government that it will introduce legislation that reasserts federal authority over the Trans Mountain project, in addition to backstopping the project with some financial help.  Andrew Coyne is relieved that a better-late-than-never mix of measures holds some promise to get the project back on track. Chantal Hébert worries that the federal government will soon find itself having to defend lawsuits on two fronts.  The first comes from BC (and possibly supported by Quebec) on the province’s constitutional power to regulate the environment on its territory versus Ottawa’s power to carry out infrastructure projects in the strategic national interest.  The second is the threat of legal action from Manitoba and Saskatchewan that would challenge the federal government’s carbon tax plans.

Before the Sunday Summit between Trudeau, Alberta Premier Rachel Notley and B.C. Premier John Horgan, David Moscrop wrote offered up a useful reminder that the “political intractability” surrounding the Kinder Morgan crisis is – in spite of what some commentators are peddling – is really part of Canada’s slow and plodding democratic process:

What we’re seeing with the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline debate is democracy, federalism, and the rule of law at work: a divided country working out their opinions on the matter, split jurisdiction actors pursuing their interests, responsive governments keeping their promises, political and legal battles across several sites of licit contestation—and, to boot, a market response of potentially pulling the plug on the project as shareholders vote with their confidence and their dollars.

Filed Under:
Comments
No comments


Leave message



 
 Security code